Conservative Culture

Tookie’s the innocent. Tookie’s the victim. The following is the letter from the Save Tookie website. It should have read “Stanley Tookie Williams in cold blood, cruelly and maliciously executed his victims. Crimes that cannot be forgotten by his real victims. What is the AME church thinking? Won’t they speak in defense of those who continue to be victims of the gang Tookie started? Instead they honor him. Reformed but never a criminal. Go figure. So ends (you think) the story of Barabbas Tookie.

The State of California Killed an Innocent Man

Dear Friends,

On Tuesday, December 13th, we lost a great friend, fighter and human being. The state of California murdered Stanley Tookie Williams in cold blood, cruelly and maliciously. His execution was a 35-minute atrocity that will not be forgiven or forgotten.

We will continue to fight to prove Stan’s innocence, to continue his message of peace and to end the racist death penalty.

To all of the supporters who spent countless hours fighting to save Stan’s life, I say thank you for everything you have done. We mourn this great loss but must continue the struggle.

We have created two funds to support Stan’s legacy. One fund will help to continue his work and develop more street peace initiatives that serve needy youth and marginalized communities throughout the nation; with the other fund we plan to prove his innocence of the crimes for which he was killed.

Keep your heads up. Stan would expect nothing less.

In struggle, Barbara Becnel

No tags for this post.

Former President Clinton, ever the politician, wants to do something special for this worldwide ‘wedding’ event.

Prior the ceremony a two minute video message from the former President will be played. Clinton also made a statement for the media about the upcoming wedding.

Mr Clinton congratulates Sir Elton, 58, and David Furnish, 42, and says: “If there were more people like Elton, the world would be a better place.”

This special ‘video’ will be played at a club called Two2Much. How appropriate is about all I can say about these events.

No tags for this post.

Monogamous, Polygamous or Polyamorists? Sure all types of relationships have existed, exist and will continue to exist. In fact this list could easily be expanded or delineated into its various forms. What is notable with the new definitions of ‘Christianized’ Western Culture ‘marriage is that there is a peeling back of the Christian facade covering the current culture.

The Brussels Journal said there was little flap over the Dutch trio-marriage of one man with two bi-sexual wives. What is striking is the so-called polyamorous description. In a traditional marriage there is an exclusive sexual relationship between one man and a woman. This could be symbolized by a ’straight’ line where there is that one connection. In a polygamy it would be represented by a ‘V’ where one man had sexual relationships with two (or more) wives but the partners didn’t have any sexual relationships with each other. What the Next Marriage expansion did was to bring to the forefront a ‘marriage’ where each partner is sexually involved with all the others in the marriage. In this case it would be represented by a triangle.

Polyamorists would call the De Bruijn union a ???triad.??? In a polyamorous triad, all three partners are sexually connected. This contrasts with a three-person ???V,??? in which only one of the partners (called the ???hinge??? or ???pivot???) has a sexual relationship with the other two. So the bisexuality of Bianca and Mirjam classifies the De Bruijn union as a polyamorous bisexual triad. In another sense, the De Bruijn marriage is also a gay marriage. The Bianca-Mirjam component of the union is gay, and legalized gay marriage in Holland has clearly helped make the idea of a legally recognized bisexual triad thinkable.

While the love triangle marriage gave little reason to raise eyebrows in progressive Europe, the ‘traditional’ (??) polygamous family which has 30 children from one man who has three wives. Recreational pleasure seems easier to take than the procreational aspects which caused a population boom by one ‘family’.

Stanley Kurtz (quoted throughout the Brussels Journal has this quote which I find most insightful to the possible future of marriage.

It???s easy to imagine that, in a world where gay marriage was common and fully accepted, a serious campaign to legalize polyamorous unions would succeed ??? especially a campaign spearheaded by an organized bisexual-rights movement. Yet win or lose, the culture of marriage will be battered for years by the debate. Just as we???re now continually reminded that not all married couples have children, we???ll someday be endlessly told that not all marriages are monogamous (nor all monogamists married).

It is becoming obvious that the future of marriage, unless something drastic happens, what has happened in Europe will again find its way to America.

Tags: Marriage Expansion

Great blog on Iraq. Found it thanks to Michelle Malkin. Here is a powerful picture of one soldier who risked his life to rescue a little girl. Pictures not seen on MSM (main stream media).

No tags for this post.