ACLU Should be Pro-Choice On Death Penalty

The ACLU is all for pro-choice. A mother who decides that the life within her which is both innocent and dependent can be terminated in a variety of ways. Once such permitted method is the infamous ‘partial birth’ method of puncturing the skull and extracting the brains (where is our first right amendment to show that on TV).

In the case of the not-so innocent criminal who has committed violent rape or kidnapping, or murdered then I also am for choice. The people (the other in this case) has a dependent life within that is not innocent and is now dependent on the people. They ought to the freedom of choice to terminate this life as well. However, since we are compassionate, we can offer an alternative to those on death row. Let them choose how they would like to die. Consider it letting them die ‘with dignity’.

If one is objectionable to the hangman’s noose we have several forms of lethal injection. One requires a doctor(s) and the other does not. Who is tired of the ACLU condemning the death penalty as too violent. So we clean it up and they say it is too sanitized. They just object to killing the guilty but not the innocent.

The ACLU says the injection protocol violates the rights of execution witnesses by not allowing them to see if the inmate is experiencing pain before death.

The group says the only reason San Quentin State Prison officials inject a paralyzing agent is to sanitize the execution and prevent witnesses from perhaps seeing convulsions.

The paralyzing drug, according to the lawsuit, ???makes it impossible for witnesses to determine whether death row inmates in California are being subjected to substantial and unnecessary pain before dying.???

Let the nonsense end and let pr0-choice in death penalties reign. What would be your choice - Bullet or Syringe?

Those on top of this story include:
Wide Awakes- ACLU Says Lethal Injection Violates 1st Amendment
California Conservative - ACLU Says Lethal Injection Violates 1st Amendment

Stop the ACLU - ACLU Says Lethal Injection Violates 1st Amendment

Open TrackBack:
Cao’s Blog

Technorati Tags: Conservative