The only information of substance to be found about Guglielmi are ads about how to say his name and that he is pro-everything conservative. But the substance is missing. In the end you are left to ‘trust’ that he really is.
I have been giving it considerable thought since Guglielmi has spent nearly $600,000 of his own money for the campaign already (if that is not correct… please comment). Those concerns were compounded by dropping the name of Voinovich. Are we going to end up with a liberal Republican in office should his campaign pull it out? Is Ohio’s 4th district going to buy the pro-family, pro-life stance without any credentials? If this happens we will likely end up with a Congressman ‘Taft’ type Republican. I make the connection because Voinovich and Taft are similar in one main aspect. Neither are conservative.
More information about the Guglielmi family surfaced through Google. It’s tragic news for those not knowing. But I raise it because it reveals some concerns about who some might be voting for.
On Spring Break 2000 the Guglielmi family lost their son Andrew. Andrew was on a drinking binge and leaned over a balcony on the third floor. He fell. The family was told Andrew only had a 50-50 chance of living. Unfortunately, Andrew didn’t survive. A parent’s nightmare. A tragedy that we hope we don’t face and certainly don’t wish this on any family.
What does this reveal about their family? Many kids get drunk and go to Florida or vice versa. Why pick on a sad moment? Read their responses to the tragedy. Does this reflect the person you want in Washington?
“He was seduced by hotels, bars, and the alcohol folks,” Guglielmi says. “I put the advertisers in the same hopper. The advertising comes to the kids subtly; you watch these programs, MTV, kids doing degrading things on the beach with beer. It’s threaded with movies and TV selling this type of behavior.”
“How much can we parents do in these MTV-like environments?” asks Frank Guglielmi, whose son Andrew died during a trip to Panama City Beach. “I urge (the alcohol, hotel and tour industries) to help us. Certainly, as a parent, I’m responsible. But other people who, through the strength of advertising, have created an environment for this to happen have to take responsibility, too. It’s very seductive.”
“The intensive care unit was a war zone. There were families camped out everywhere. There were kids in comas,” Guglielmi said.
“What we parents learned is that this scene was repeated every year at the same time.”
Nan and Frank are haunted by the steady parade of injured teens they saw in the Florida hospital during the family’s vigil in the intensive care. Others there were also fighting for their lives after balcony falls, and there were girls in comas because they had unknowingly consumed drinks spiked with drugs. The Guglielmis want to help raise awareness about the realities of spring break alcohol use in order help others and to make positive social change from the tragedy of their son’s death.
You will find that Guglielmi is a social activist with a tragic story. He has lots of money to buy the race but he is out of touch or lying if he knows about MTV but knows nothing about the drinking and parties down there. Perhaps he is both. The real danger is if he is given the power to legislate. Talk about frivolous lawsuits. When someone dies and we suddenly feel all this pain there will need to be more awareness, more programs forcing others to step up and take responsibility for those type deaths. Guglielmi’s ads would be more genuine if they would say ‘Guglielmi for positive social change.’
I don’t buy the ads or the rhetoric. Guglielmi should stay in business and be a real help creating jobs. Leave the ‘positive social changes’ to individuals and not the government. The last thing we need is more government. Perhaps there were too many unknowns… but I now know more than I want and it isn’t pretty.
Tags:
Conservative,
Ohio,
Pro-Life