Bush A Gay Basher or a Freedom Fighter?
April 18, 2006 by Conservative Culture
Filed under General
Their logic goes like this. Bush is for promoting celibacy until marriage. Bush is also against legalizing full marriage for gays. Hence, he says all gays must be celebate.
In other words, if you???re gay, the Bush administration has decided that you should be taught to never, ever engage in ???any type??? of ???sexual stimulation??? ??? ever.
Throughout the entire curriculum, the term ???marriage??? must be defined as ???only a legal union between one man and one woman as a husband and wife, and the word ???spouse??? refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.??? (Consistent with Federal law)
Since when did they ever wait until someone told them what they could or could not do. The Creator who gave us our inalienable rights also sets the rules on acceptable behavior. He limits the behavior for both straight and gays. Some have chided me for worrying about sex. Nonsense. Some have chided me for worrying about gays while excusing bad straight behavior. Nonsense.
Its’ about a society and culture founded on the principle that we have a Creator who gives us both liberty and limitations on how to live so that the truth might gives us the maximum freedom as a society.
For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. - Col. 1:16
Those who choose to ignore the Creator who gave us these Rights and Responsibilities curtail and diminish our overall freedom. For the violation of those principals causes us to become enslaved…. not free.
In that case, Bush is not a Gay basher but a Freedom Fighter through these issues. Some will have nothing to do with but would prefer enslavement.
Trackback Parties:
http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/172394.php
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/04/beltway_traffic_jam-217/
Reg Derlmut on Mon, 5th Jun 2006 7:32 pm
It was Robert Bork who said that Bush had not governed as a conservative. It was William F. Buckley who said that Bush is “no conservative” and by that he meant not a movement conservative. When he had the right wing base with him Bush did not govern as a social conservative (eg. Justice Miers). Now that he is losing the base Bush will make a show of being right, but litle more.