Conservative Culture

More brazen than the car burnings last year by the Muslim Youth. However, you wonder about the wisdom of the police considering the past. Thirty youths stone your car… do you get out or call for backup?

The “youth” (the traditional euphemism for Muslim immigrants) have apparently been inspired by the brazen effrontery against the most venerated man in Christendom. First a gang of 30 stoned an unmarked police car. When the officers got out of the car, they were surrounded and attacked with iron bars…

No arrests were made following the incident, police said.

“These youths fear nothing,” a police union official said on LCI television.

You wonder why? I like the way Atlas Shrugs puts it. (HT To Atlas!)

Why should they fear when there are no arrests after breaking the skulls of police? Why should they fear when they have been given areas where they can engage in gang rape unmolested and where adult Muslims spit on victims who complain? Why should they fear when, at the beginning of the French Intifada, police made an official decision to retreat? Why should they fear when dozens of neighbors can drop in as accomplices to the most horrific anti-Semitic torture on record without a single tip to the police? Why should they fear when women are not defended from assault within large groups in daylight? Why should they fear when demonstrators can brazenly call for the murder of the Pope outside Westminster Cathedral and openly state their intention that “Islam Will Conquer Rome” without even a single Londoner complaining to the police?

Turn to Britain and see how they even deny the ability of the police to enter their neighborhood.

Abu Izadeen and other minions of Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed interrupt a press conference by the Home Secretary about terrorism shouting “how dare you come to a Muslim area“.

How dare you come to a Muslim area!

How dare you come to a Muslim area!

Just follow Allah’s links here to see the video.

If that isn’t a rejection of British legal sovereignty and an out and out declaration of open rebellion, I don’t know what is. The Home Secretary says Izadeen does not believe that “Muslim areas” are part of Britain. He’s right, he doesn’t.

Can’t anyone really see what is going on? The goal is to either take over, ignore a nation’s right to govern itself apart from Muslim law or both. Tie this in with Iran’s President and his remarks… and Chavez’s… and you have the making of multiple attacks against western nation’s. Oh… I shouldn’t neglect mentioning Mexico’s similar attitude.

No tags for this post.

Crossposted from Stop The ACLU
Via The ACLU Website:

The American Civil Liberties Union today expressed its disappointment with the House passage of a bill placing undue and unnecessary burdens on Americans’ fundamental right to vote. H.R. 4844, the “Federal Election Integrity Act of 2006,” requires voters to present a government-issued photo ID in order to vote in federal elections. In addition, beginning in 2010 voters would be required to present a photo ID that was issued based on proof of citizenship in order to vote. The measure passed by a vote of 228-196.

The following can be attributed to Caroline Fredrickson, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office:

“Less than two months after the renewal of the Voting Rights Act, the House of Representatives has chosen to pass legislation disenfranchising the very citizens the VRA was designed to protect. No eligible citizen should have to pay to vote. There are voters who simply don’t have photo ID and requiring them to purchase one in order to vote would be tantamount to a poll tax. This measure will disproportionately impact racial and ethnic minority voters, senior citizens, voters with disabilities, and others who do not have photo identification nor the financial means to acquire it.”

What a load of crap! This ridiculous “poll tax” meme is quickly making its rounds. Nancy Pelosi has taken the ball with this one and ran with it headlining with the alarmist title, “Voter ID Bill Is an Attempt to Suppress the Votes of Millions of American Citizens!”

Give me a break! You have got to be kidding! Perhaps they are worried this act will supress “millions” of illegals and dead people from voting! An I.D. is required in many of the most basic things in America such as driving a car or even cashing a check. Please, tell me how all of these poor people that can not afford to get an I.D. cash their welfare checks?

Rep. Henry Hyde makes the same point.

But Rep. Henry Hyde (R-Ill.), who sponsored the Federal Election Integrity Act, says requiring voters to show photo ID at the polls “presents no greater hardship than people face performing everyday activities.”

For example, Hyde noted that government-issued photo IDs are required for driving vehicles, applying for Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid, food stamps, boarding airplanes, entering government buildings, registering at school, getting student loans, renting movies, and cashing checks.

Given all the cases in which U.S. citizens are asked to produce photo IDs, it should not be difficult to produce IDs to guard against fraud in the electoral system, Hyde said.

It really isn’t surprising that the ACLU would be against making our democratic process have more integrity. After all, they know which side butters their bread. They even keep a scorecard on Congress.

The ACLU are involved across the country fighting voter I.D. laws. In Missouri at least 16 St. Louis area Democrats have been found guilty of election crimes in the last year and a half! When Republican Gov. Matt Blunt signed a law requiring voters to provide I.D. the ACLU had to come up with a different argument than the poll tax crap. Even though Missouri the Missouri law provided for free photo IDs that voters could obtain before election day the ACLU represented a group of Democrats to challenge the law by arguing for a loophole they found stating the law violated a state constitutional provision against imposing costs on local governments without providing state funding. So much for the poll tax argument or putting an undue burden on the poor.

As a matter of fact as Digger’s Realm points out:

Those against it are claiming it’s a poll tax on the poor, minorities and elderly and that they can’t afford to get a drivers license or passport. They fail to mention that the bill includes a portion to pay for free for the poor who can’t afford a photo ID.

People can see for themselves. The full text of the bill is here.

The ACLU were also involved in the recent case against a similar bill in Georgia that was struck down. It also provided free I.D.s. They also fought voter ID laws in New Mexico, Michigan, and Indiana. The ACLU has clearly shown its true colors in support of voter fraud. The only possible reason I can realistically see why someone would be against this bill is if they actually desire for voter fraud to continue. Once again the ACLU has shown just how transparent their lie of non-partisanship is. It is clear what the ACLU and democrats want. They want rights for illegal aliens, dead people, and felons to vote early and often.

This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please email Jay at Jay@stoptheaclu.com or Gribbit at GribbitR@gmail.com. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 200 blogs already on-board.

No tags for this post.