Conservative Culture

Picture and content: Political Machine

All those years grooming her own image as soft and compassionate  only to discover that she really wasn’t what she presented to the public. Big Surprise? Not really.  Though the blogger below doesn’t seem to really get it.

This Fox news article follows up on the first dog and cat of the nineties. Must be a slow news day. Was Socks the Cat just a nifty PR object or very much part of the Clinton Family?

As the “first pet” of the Clinton era, Socks, the White House cat, allowed “chilly” Hillary Clinton to show a caring, maternal side as well as bringing joy to her daughter Chelsea. So where is Socks today?

Once the presidency was over, there was no room for Socks anymore. After years of loyal service at the White House, the black and white cat was dumped on Betty Currie, Bill Clinton’s personal secretary, who also had an embarrassing clean-up role in the saga of his relationship with intern Monica Lewinsky.

Well, it doesn’t look as if Hillary was that much of a cat person, although I do remember that Bill loved Buddy, that dog went everywhere with him. Still if this is the worst thing they can dig up on Hillary she doesn’t have that much to worry about.
She may not have to worry over this… but it is an accurate reflection of who she is compared to the image she wants you to know.

No tags for this post.

 Wes Vernon writes an interesting article on the Ramos and Compean situation. The terrorist get fat sitting well protected and coddled while Ramos and Compean are treated worse than the terrorists. It’s insane and must end. Will anyone in Washington listen? Will any of the top tier candidates for President do anything? One wonders.

[Renew America] This column hopes to awake from a bad dream any minute now. Bad enough two of our protectors are in solitary confinement. But enemies who want to kill us are living very well on our money?

Time to wake up

This can’t be real.

It can’t be true that a drug smuggler illegally crashing our border was given immunity to testify against the law enforcement officers who tried to arrest him, can it?

Oh, but our government, which we depend on to “preserve, protect and defend” our system of government, would naturally seek to “preserve” and “protect” our free society by “defending” us against the bad guys, right?

I mean surely our own government would never seek out a dangerous drug-smuggling criminal in a foreign country and bring him back here and grant him immunity to testify against the border guards who blocked his efforts to destroy our kids’ lives. Surely, that didn’t really happen, did it?

It did? And they gave this guy free health care and unconditional border-crossing cards to testify against those pesky border patrol agents. Really? You have got to be kidding.

In cahoots with the criminal

By now, those not inhabiting another planet for the last year are aware of the plight of Border Patrol Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean. They were sentenced to eleven and twelve years in federal prison, respectively, for wounding a Mexican drug smuggler who brought 743 pounds of marijuana across the U.S./Mexican border at Texas.

Shooting at a drug smuggler: naughty, naughty!

Later, the U.S. government learned that the smuggler — Osbaldo Aldrete-Davila — had been shot in the buttocks as he avoided arrest, although the agents thought they had missed him before he reached the Mexican border because he had kept running, jumped into a waiting truck, and showed no signs of injury.

Upon learning of the drug dealer’s complaint, the keystone cops at the Department of Homeland Security did their “poor baby” routine and swung into action.

To cut to the quick, the agents ended up being prosecuted for shooting an unarmed victim, even though that “victim” while on the run had pointed at them with what looked like a gun.

No tags for this post.

In 2004 the Congress imposed stricter requirements. It’s just now that they are being enforced? And of course remember the following doesn’t apply to those who don’t use the main routes (like roads).

 [International Reporter] El Paso: October 21, 2007 - The laws for the United States border have been generally loose for years together, the people used to enter the country without any difficulty, particularly Americans returning home from Mexico. Most the people crossed to the United States on false pretexts.

The people entering from the border had a simple procedure and thousands of people were allowed to enter America without any valid Identity Cards, passports or proof of citizenship, the easygoing procedure has been prevalent.

From January, all the people wishing to enter United States shall have to show their proper passports or some other strict proof of their citizenship.

This process shall simply delay the entry at border crossings, the new rule enacted shall tighten the screws of the fake people. In fact, Congress imposed these restrictions in 2004 as part of their anti-terrorism legislation, but these were not strictly followed and the people entered the United States with some cautious. But now it may become impossible to cheat the officers.

No tags for this post.