Protest At LA Times

Free the tapes!

Tags: Libs Exposed

Obama Removes US Flag and Safeguards

There continue to be mounting concerns about Obama and the MSM (mainstream media) continue to give Obama and the US a quick ride into a very questionable future. Many of these issues don’t appear to be significant by themselves but together they raise “red flags” all over the place (and I don’t mean communist either). Americans who love the Republic need seriously reconsider marking “Obama” on the upcoming ballot.

Two recent issues surfaced thanks to the good work of fellow bloggers who have kept a sharp eye for anything that didn’t look right. One has to do with the American Flag and the other has to do with illegal contributions to the Obama campaign in these last days.

Craig from No Quater made several donations to the Obama campaign and was able to discover that the normal safeguards for contributions have been removed making verification impossible. It means that thousands if not millions of dollars are being fradulenat given to fund the last days of the campaign. How long has this been going on? Graig begins…

I’ve read recent reports of the Obama campaign receiving donations from dubious names and foreign locales and it got me wondering: How is this possible?

I run a small internet business and when I process credit cards, I’m required to make sure the name on the card exactly matches the name of the customer making the purchase. Also, the purchaser’s address must match that of the cardholder. If these don’t match, then the payment isn’t approved. Period. So how is it possible that the Obama campaign could receive donations from fictional people and places?

I decided to do a little experiment. I went to the Obama campaign website and entered the following:

Name: John Galt

Address: 1957 Ayn Rand Lane

City: Galts Gulch

State: CO

Zip: 99999

I then checked the $15 donation box and entered my actual credit card number and expiration date. The website did not ask for the 3-digit verification code on the back of the card. Instead, I was sent to the next page which displayed:

Read more

Tags: Libs Exposed, Political Races

Brunner: “Not Progressive Enough” is the new Racist

Don’t say it… but we all know what she is saying. Brunner says “your too stupid” and “your racist.” Nonsense statements followed by the so called “Bradley” effect. Wow.

Tags: Ohio

Carnival of Ohio Politics #140

Carnival of Ohio Politics #140

By the time you read this edition of the carnival, we could be about 140 hours from having a good sense of who, if anybody, accurately predicted the allocation of states, electoral votes and the popular vote between John McCain and Barack Obama. I don’t know about you, but I was just describing to someone else that I feel and see the time left between now and then as being similar to what an accordian looks like went it’s completely smushed and compressed…and out of air.

Being bloggers such as we are, however, means never being out of air.
(The caption says, “The Hazards of Online Voting”)
(from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer)

Tags: Carnival, Ohio

Born Alive Responds To Obama

Born Alive.org: Obama, why would you want to kill a baby born alive just because they didn’t succeed in killing the baby during an abortion?

Tags: Pro-Life

Next Month: Connecticut’s New Marriage Law

Once again a new law and it comes straight from the bench. That’s right. You don’t have to settle for civil unions. Why settle for legislation when those on the bench can set a new law.

Whatever side you are on this again marks a slow but steady cadence toward the marriage expansion across the US. Just wait if Obama gets in and can appoint new judges to the Federal Benches let alone the Supreme Court.

Gay marriages to begin next month in Connecticut

By SUSAN HAIGH – 2 hours ago

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Officials are gearing up for the day next month when gay and lesbian couples can begin tying the knot in Connecticut.

Attorneys involved in the gay marriage case said Tuesday that couples can begin picking up marriage license applications sometime on or after Nov. 10. A judge at the New Haven Superior Court, where the case began in 2004, still must decide the precise date.

The state Supreme Court’s decision allowing same-sex marriages became official Tuesday with its publication in the Connecticut Law Journal. The publication triggered a 10-day period when motions for reconsideration can be filed.

Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said after that period ends on Nov. 10, the Superior Court judge can act on the high court’s ruling.

The judgment may come later that week because Nov. 10 is a Monday, a busy day for the Superior Court, and Tuesday is a state holiday.

The state Department of Public Health is having new marriage applications printed that reflect the change. Instead of putting one name under “bride” and the other under “groom,” couples will see two boxes marked “bride/groom/spouse.” The new forms are expected to be shipped out to city and town clerks later this week.

“The moment the judgment is entered, the state of Connecticut is required to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. And we expect the clerks will be ready,” said Bennett H. Klein, senior attorney with the Boston-based Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders.

The state Supreme Court issued a 4-3 decision on Oct. 10 that same-sex couples have the right to wed rather than accept a civil union law designed to give them the same rights as married couples. Connecticut became the third state, behind Massachusetts and California, to legalize gay marriage.

The Associated Press: Gay marriages to begin next month in Connecticut.

Tags: Marriage Expansion

Next Page »