Dirty Charlie Rangel’s Quid Pro Quo?

“Look! My Hands Are Clean” Now that the election is over the New York Times can again process stories about corrupt Democratic political figures like Charlie Rangel. Maybe the reason they have time now is that they are all back from Alaska hunting down Palin and her children. These stories should have been forefront in October but we know how this works.

Right now Rangel is under investigation inthe House for failure the pay taxes.

Rangel is under investigation by the House ethics committee for failure to pay taxes on income from a beach house in the Dominican Republic, his use of several rent-stabilized apartments in Harlem, and letters he wrote on congressional stationery trying to drum up donors for the college center named in his honor.

Report links Rangel school gift to tax loophole - USATODAY.com.

No wonder he didn’t mind helping an offshore drilling company that he felt was skirting tax law by being offshore. In fact Rangel apparently found it beneficial. We are always in trouble when the politicians find an interest apart from the nation they serve. Whose hands did he have in his pocket? More than we can count? We may never know.

But in 2007, when the United States Senate tried to crack down on the companies, Mr. Rangel, who had recently been sworn in as House Ways and Means chairman, fought to protect them. The tax shelter for the four companies was preserved, saving Nabors an estimated tens of millions of dollars annually and depriving the federal treasury of $1.1 billion in revenues over a decade, according to a Congressional analysis by the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation.

Mr. Rangel said he stood with Nabors because, as much as he was offended by the company’s attempts to get around some of its United States taxes, he thought it wrong to impose a retroactive tax increase. The congressman said he has long believed that retroactive punishments are bad public policy.

Mr. Rangel also said that the pledge from the Nabors chief executive, Eugene M. Isenberg, one of the largest the school received, played no role in his decision to protect the loophole, and maintained that he did not even know about it until this summer, more than a year later. His aides said he also later pushed tax legislation that would have adversely affected Nabors and hundreds of other offshore companies, though those efforts came to naught.

Mr. Isenberg said that he pledged the money — $200,000 of which he has already paid — because the school is a worthy cause, and that he never sought or received special treatment from Mr. Rangel.

“There was no quid pro quo,” Mr. Isenberg said in an interview on Friday.

What is clear is that Mr. Rangel played a pivotal role in preserving the tax shelter for Nabors and the other companies in 2007. And while the issue was before his committee, Mr. Rangel met with Mr. Isenberg and a lobbyist for Nabors and discussed it, on the same morning that the congressman and Mr. Isenberg met to talk about the chief executive’s potential support for the Rangel center.

The Congressman, the Donor and the Tax Break - NYTimes.com.

Tags: Libs Exposed

Radical Islam Force Prisoners To Submit and Support Rape

What is the true agenda of Radical Muslims not only in the world but also here in America. You think that radicals are not actively working to change America and bring about Sharia Law? You wanted freedom from the principles of the Constitution and have removed the principles of truth and justice that came from the Judea Christian backgrounds and you are on the verge of Islam which will very harsh and difficult. It is a religion that has supported marriage to very young girls, sexual harassment of woman and forced submission. Scare you? It should.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5034007578724539361

The idea of raping woman to subdue the land being promoted in Israel.

On October 31, 2008, an Egyptian female lawyer by the name of Nagla Al-Imam suggested on the Arab TV channel “Al-Arabiya” that Arab men should sexually harass Israeli women, stating: “Leave the land so we won’t rape you.” She then argued that Israeli young girls and women are fair game for all Arab men and that there is nothing wrong in using this kind of threat as a form of resistance.

Does Ms. Al-Imam know the consequences of her message to sexually repressed young Muslim men? Does she have any human feelings towards the suffering of a woman being raped, even if she is an enemy? Isn’t she worried about the impact of this ‘license to rape’ on the character of young Muslim men and its impact on society as a whole?

Doesn’t her suggestion confirm the existence of Muslim Sharia laws that allow the sexual slavery of captive women in time of war? Doesn’t she know that such statements and action by Muslim men will increase the worldwide fear of Islam?

All of this is not very good for those who want to improve the image of Islam.

Things said and done, even by intellectuals, in the Middle East, personally no longer surprise me anymore. What I always ask myself is: Where are the protests of the so-called ‘moderate’ Muslims? Where are the voices of those who want to ‘educate’ and give ‘sensitivity training’ to the American public about how Islam is a religion of peace? Why are they not shouting “not in the name of my religion”?

I found it amusing to see the moral compass of the Muslim world when I watched an interview with the Egyptian cleric Zaghloul Al Naggar, who said on Iqra TV on September 11, 2008, that Muslims must reform the moral corruption of the West. Or when I listen to Muslim leadership say that we should take the opportunity of the financial crisis in the West to spread Islam. We, Arabs and Muslims, must think of how low we will allow our morality to go for (presumably) land we can hardly see on the map of the Arab world. If that will not wake the West up, I do not know what will.

FrontPage Magazine.

The terror being committed against those in close contact with Muslims in British jails.

MUSLIM prisoners have launched a reign of terror inside a top security British jail.

The fanatics are forcing fellow inmates to convert to Islam or face punishment beatings.

One man who stood up to the thugs was branded with a lump of hot metal, according to a prison source.

The crisis at Whitemoor jail in Cambridgeshire has led to calls by staff for the 100 Muslim inmates there to be dispersed to other prisons round the country.

Some Al Qaeda supporters have set up a kangaroo court, sitting in judgment on prisoners and ordering punishments, the source said.

The violent disciples of Osama Bin Laden have targeted even the toughest non-Muslim prisoners, including killers and rapists.

Local Tory MP Malcolm Moss said: “They are a law unto themselves. The governor should sort these problems out.”

Sunday Express | UK News :: Muslim fanatics ‘hijack British prison’.

Tags: Jihad

Jihad Day Care

Fun for the whole family. Remember, it’s not too late to start training your young son for Jihad the seventy virgins. Your sons will find young Islamists for Jihad is a real blast. So sign up today and get a free belt pack free with any purchase of a childhood of “death camp”. Their lives will never be the same.

Help support the take over of the free world for Allah. This ad paid for by the Friends of Allah and Jihad Children for the wealfare of “Save the Whales”.

Tags: Jihad

The Defense of Islam’s Pedophilia

I have seen the video’s demonstrating Mohammad’s marriage to a 6 year old (though he didn’t consumate the marriage until age 9… wow, what restraint). I have also watch the defense of such actions of men in Islam today. It becomes clear that one easily justifies such marriages today by reaching for Muhammad and justifying his sin. Welcome to the new age. We have seen such actions by Cult’s in America and it is disgusting behavior. Does the teaching of such marriages cause a repudiation by “moderate” Muslims?

Should this be exposed? Is it dangerous to expose such things? Is this just a cultural thing and are the peophilia  forces in the United States right advocating similar things about “consential” relationships between adults and children? Will the United States be able to justify codifying such marriages after allowing same-sex marriages? The world has lost it’s mind. Have you joined in. Speak up and post your comments.

The Prophet Muhammad is the model we follow. He took ‘Aisha to be his wife when she was six, but he had sex with her only when she was nine.

Interviewer: When she was six…

Dr. Ahmad Al-Mu’bi: He married her at the age of six, and he consummated the marriage, by having sex with her for the first time, when she was nine. We consider the Prophet Muhammad to be our model.

Interviewer: My question to you is whether the marriage of a 12-year-old boy with an 11-year-old girl is a logical marriage, which is permitted by Islamic law.

Dr. Ahmad Al-Mu’bi: If the guardian is the father… There are two different types of guardianship. If the guardian is the father, and he marries his daughter off to a man of appropriate standing, the marriage is obviously valid.

[...]

People find themselves in all kinds of circumstances. Take, for example, a man who has two, three, or four daughters. He does not have any wives, but he needs to go on a trip. Isn’t it better to marry his daughter to a man, who will protect and sustain her, and when she reaches the proper age, he will have sex with her? Who says all men are ferocious wolves?

Dhimmi Watch: Saudi “marriage officiant”: Muhammad married Aisha when she was six and had sex with her when she was nine.

Tags: Islam, Marriage Expansion

Worship the Rock

It’s a scene most Americans don’t see and can hardly imagine. Yet all around the world are cultures whose life and government are based around such beliefs. Let no one think that this isn’t possible to become a significant group eventually in the United States when you abadon the roots this nation were founded on.

South Korean mothers pray to God for help prior to the KSAT (Korea Scholastic Aptitude Test) at Palgong mountain in South Korea November 12, 2008. You Witness News/Kyungwon Kuk

Tags: Religion

Liberals Look To Throw Out California Votes!

Until the people vote on something they can’t agree with. So when the people vote on an issue that is viewed as anti-progressive they will then turn to the courts to over turn the vote. The people of California overturned a gay marriage law with a court decision from California’s Supreme Court.

The proposition passed with 52 percent of the vote. Fairly sizable considering you are talking California.The proposition didn’t take away the rights of people to live together or even to get civil unions. It simple kept the definition of marriage as between a man and a woman. Not good enough for the marriage expansionists.

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - California’s Attorney General on Monday urged the state Supreme Court to consider whether a gay marriage ban passed by voters this month was legal.

The state’s top lawyer, former governor Jerry Brown, said the court should keep the ban in place while it considers the issue — and it should rule quickly.

California’s ban marked a major reversal for same-sex couples, who had won state Supreme Court approval to marry in the trend-setting state in May.

Only a handful of states, provinces and European countries recognize same-sex marriage and gay marriage advocates have demonstrated vocally around the country since the November 4 vote.

Gay marriage advocates have argued in court that the ban vote was improper, since it was passed in an amendment process requiring majority approval — the ban won 52 percent support.

California court urged to review gay marriage ban | Politics | Reuters.

Tags: Libs Exposed, Marriage Expansion

Next Page »